Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.63 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.85 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 192.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is much better than Xperia XA's 67.9 global score. Google Pixel 3a's design is extremely newer, but a little thicker and a bit heavier than the Xperia XA. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit superior CPU than Xperia XA, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3a also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3a has a sharper display than Xperia XA, because it has a better display pixels density, a way better 1080 x 2220px resolution and a little bit larger screen. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a way better camera than Xperia XA, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light images and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 3a has just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XA, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 3a features improved battery duration than Sony Xperia XA, because it has a 30% more battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.