Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| 2017-05-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than the Xperia XA1 Ultra, with a overall score of 82 against 72.8. The iPhone XR body is newer than Xperia XA1 Ultra's, but it is a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. IPhone XR features a little bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a bit worse count of pixels per inch of display and a quite lower 828 x 1792 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Xperia XA1 Ultra counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. IPhone XR features a greater processing power than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR takes much better videos and photos than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution and a tinier sensor, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations. The Apple iPhone XR has a bit longer battery performance than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a 9% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.