Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-05-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.71 x 2.64 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than Sony Xperia XA1, getting a general score of 76.4 against 71.7. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, Motorola Droid Turbo's body is a lot older, somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker than Sony Xperia XA1. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better screen than Xperia XA1, because it has a little larger display, a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a way higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processor than Sony Xperia XA1, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics processor. The Xperia XA1 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia XA1 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XA1, because it has a 70% greater battery size. The Motorola Droid Turbo takes slightly better videos and photos than Xperia XA1, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 20.7 MP resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Motorola Droid Turbo not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.