Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.71 x 2.64 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xperia XA1, having a general score of 98.9 against 71.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is extremely newer than the Xperia XA1, it's noticeably heavier and just a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better performance than Sony Xperia XA1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better screen than Xperia XA1, because it has a much greater amount of pixels per inch in the display, a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a lot bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better camera than Xperia XA1, because it has a way better resolution camera in the back, a larger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior storage for games and applications than Xperia XA1, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XA1, because it has a 96% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than the Xperia XA1, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.