Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-01 | -- |
| 5.71 x 2.64 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is much better than the Xperia XA1's 71.7 overall score. Galaxy S25's body is extremely thinner and much lighter than the Xperia XA1. The Sony Xperia XA1 features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S25 counts with a much sharper display than Xperia XA1, because it has a higher pixels density, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger display. The Galaxy S25 takes way better pictures and videos than Xperia XA1, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures, a lot higher video quality, a way larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XA1, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S25 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XA1, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xperia XA1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xperia XA1. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S25, else you can save some money and buy the Xperia XA1, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.