Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ Premium has a score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. The Xperia XZ Premium is an much older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. The Xperia XZ Premium features a much more vibrant display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 2160 x 3840.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior processor than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior camera than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels, a way higher video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.