Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 801 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, with a global score of 88.1 against 79.8. Samsung Galaxy F62's body is noticeably newer than Sony Xperia XZ Premium's, although it's thicker and heavier. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although they are slower).
Xperia XZ Premium counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2160 x 3840, much more brightness and a way better display pixel density. The Galaxy F62 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 3230mAh. Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much larger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.