Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-01 | -- |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than the Xperia XZ Premium, with a overall score of 82.6 against 79.8. Galaxy S25's design is much thinner and much lighter than Xperia XZ Premium. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has a quite smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2160 x 3840px and a way higher pixels number per inch of display.
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Galaxy S25 shoots greater photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has greater battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.