Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xperia XZ Premium, with a 94.6 score against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a notably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Xperia XZ Premium, but it is incredibly heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better performance than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xperia XZ Premium features a way better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the display and a lot better 2160 x 3840 resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 39 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.