Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro, having a 79.8 score against 78.3. Xperia XZ Premium is a just a little heavier cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, but they are equally thin. Xperia XZ Premium counts with an incredibly better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher display pixels density and a lot higher 2160 x 3840 resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Vivo X70 Pro has a much better battery duration than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 3230mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.