Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, getting a global score of 78.3 against 74.6. Even though vivo X70 Pro is incredibly heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, it's somewhat thinner and way newer. The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better display than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a really bigger screen.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM. The vivo X70 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. The vivo X70 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, higher video frame rate, a larger aperture and a way better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.