Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-09-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ1 has an overall score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. Xperia XZ1 is a extremely newer device, and it's also extremely thinner and lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels quantity in each inch of display.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ1, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. Xperia XZ1 has a slightly better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a less mega pixels camera in the back, they both have a F2 aperture.
Xperia XZ1 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia XZ1 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo features a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 44% larger battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZ1 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Xperia XZ1, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.