Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-09-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ1's global score of 78.3. Galaxy A32's design is noticeably newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than the Sony Xperia XZ1. Sony Xperia XZ1 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display. The Xperia XZ1 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia XZ1 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A32 takes clearer photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger camera aperture and a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution. The Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery duration than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.