Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ1 is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 78.3 score against 77.8. The Xperia XZ1 design is notably lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released many years before. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Xperia XZ1, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a really larger display and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZ1, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Xperia XZ1 counts with a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 111% more battery size. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Xperia XZ1, because it has a bigger aperture, a way more MP back camera, a way better video quality and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Sony Xperia XZ1 is also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.