Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a 79 score against 78.3. Xperia XZ2 Compact is an a lot older and notably thicker cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, but Sony could make it a bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, offering some nice extra features.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density. The vivo X70 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro has a superior camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X70 Pro has more storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.