Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Although it's the best phone we compare here, the Xperia XZ2 Premium construction is a lot older, noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than vivo X70 Pro. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features an incredibly better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2160 x 3840 resolution and a lot higher display pixels density.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X70 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low light photos, higher video frame rate, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos.
The vivo X70 Pro has improved battery life than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3540mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.