Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Green, Pink and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 has a global score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Even though the Xperia XZ2 is notably older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still a little bit lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a way larger display, a way brighter display and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The Xperia XZ2 has a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Xperia XZ2, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Xperia XZ2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.