Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-17 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Xperia XZ3, with a score of 83.7 against 79.6. LG V50 ThinQ's design is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Xperia XZ3, although they were only released 7 months apart. These devices include Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xperia XZ3 features a bit more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a little smaller screen, they both have a greater pixels number in each inch of screen.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage for games and applications than Xperia XZ3, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. LG V50 ThinQ features better battery performance than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3330mAh.
The Xperia XZ3 takes a bit better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.