Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ3 is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a score of 79.6 against 76.4. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia XZ3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Xperia XZ3's design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is also a little heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Xperia XZ3 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a processor that's very similar to the CPU in Xperia XZ3, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has less RAM and a lower number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Xperia XZ3 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it has a lower video resolution and a camera in the back with a lower resolution, they both have a F2 aperture.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 17% larger battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xperia XZ3, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.