Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a global score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. Even though Sony Xperia XZ3 is just a bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's somewhat thinner and also much newer. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Sony Xperia XZ3 has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Xperia XZ3 and the Motorola DROID Turbo feature very similar processing units, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better looking display than Xperia XZ3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Xperia XZ3 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia XZ3 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo features better battery life than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3330mAh.
Sony Xperia XZ3 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a lower resolution back facing camera, they both have a F2 diafragm aperture.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xperia XZ3, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.