Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2018-10-17 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ3, getting a general score of 84.7 against 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy A32 construction is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ3's, but it's a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
Xperia XZ3 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A32. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Xperia XZ3 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a little bit better camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a larger camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3330mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.