Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 900.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Xperia XZ3, getting a general score of 91.8 against 79.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A71 5G is a newer device, and it is also a little lighter and thinner than Xperia XZ3.
The Xperia XZ3 features a better screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater number of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ3, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better camera than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a much more MP camera, a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with greater battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.