Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2018-10-17 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 900.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Xperia XZ3, having a general score of 90.5 against 79.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a little heavier than the Xperia XZ3, it's thinner and also newer. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while Xperia XZ3 counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
Xperia XZ3 features a brighter display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit superior CPU than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A90 5G takes much better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a camera in the back with way more MP and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A90 5G features improved battery duration than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.