Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-17 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 900.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ3 is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a global score of 79.6 against 77.8. Even though the Sony Xperia XZ3 is a lot older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter. These phones include Android OS, but Sony Xperia XZ3 has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better display than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has a little worse pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a really bigger screen and a way brighter display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor, a way better resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory for apps and games than Xperia XZ3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 71% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Sony Xperia XZ3 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.