Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than the Xperia Z2a, with a score of 76.4 against 73. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Motorola Droid Turbo body is a little heavier and a bit thicker than Xperia Z2a.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better screen than Xperia Z2a, because it has a greater pixel amount in each display inch, a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a little larger display. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xperia Z2a, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor and a 3 GB RAM, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a faster graphics processing unit working at 500 megahertz.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a slightly better camera than Sony Xperia Z2a, although it has worse video frame rates, they both have the same video quality and a same resolution back camera. The Xperia Z2a has a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has superior battery duration than Sony Xperia Z2a, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.