Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than Xperia Z2a, having a 77.9 score against 73. Motorola DROID Turbo's body is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Xperia Z2a. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2, so it gives you a lot of extra features.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better screen than Sony Xperia Z2a, because it has a little larger display, a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better screen density. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia Z2a, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit faster processor than Sony Xperia Z2a, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory and a Quad-Core CPU, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a faster GPU working at 500 MHz. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with improved battery lifetime than Xperia Z2a, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola DROID Turbo takes clearer photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z2a, although it has worse video frame rate, they both have a 20.7 megapixels resolution camera and the same (4K) video quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.