Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Xperia Z2a's global score of 73. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is a lot thinner but heavier than Xperia Z2a. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2 version.
Xperia Z2a has a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 4 less cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better looking screen than Xperia Z2a, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a way better 2200 x 2480px resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Xperia Z2a, because it has a much bigger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior storage to install games and applications than Xperia Z2a, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 496 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Xperia Z2a, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xperia Z2a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xperia Z2a. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xperia Z2a, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.