Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.39 x 2.83 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Xperia Z2a's 73 general score. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version and Xperia Z2a has Android 4.4.2. Vivo X60 Pro is a a bit heavier but incredibly thinner cellphone than the Xperia Z2a.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Xperia Z2a, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 9 GB more RAM. The Sony Xperia Z2a features a better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia Z2a, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xperia Z2a, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a back camera with way more megapixels, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro features a superior battery performance than Xperia Z2a, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.