Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.0 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2015-01-05 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray and Red |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 185.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 7.2 | 6.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has a global score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 general score. The Xperia Z4v body is a bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the LG G Flex 2, and both were only released 5 months apart. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, offering some additional features.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a little more vivid display than LG G Flex 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit better processing unit than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have a 600 MHz graphics processing unit, the same number of cores and the same RAM amount, the LG G Flex 2 also has a 64-bits CPU.
LG G Flex 2 features as much storage for games and applications as the Sony Xperia Z4v one, both of them have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB and the same 32 GB internal storage capacity. The Sony Xperia Z4v takes way better photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has a much better 20.7 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG G Flex 2 features a battery duration that's just as good as Xperia Z4v's battery life.
Although Sony Xperia Z4v is a better device, it is more expensive than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get LG G Flex 2, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.