Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Although Xperia Z4v is notably older and just a little thicker than the vivo X70 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with more RAM. Xperia Z4v has a more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro features a superior camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way larger sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos, a lot more mega-pixels camera, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture.
Vivo X70 Pro features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro has a way better battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.