Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a score of 80.7 against 72.1. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is a bit lighter and thinner than TCL 10 Pro, although it was released around 19 months before. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit better display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
TCL 10 Pro features a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The TCL 10 Pro features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size. The TCL 10 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also has a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.