Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Ember gray | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is better than TCL 10 Pro, having an 82.7 score against 72.1. Although LG G8X ThinQ and the TCL 10 Pro were released only 7 months apart, LG G8X ThinQ's body is a little heavier but just a little thinner than the TCL 10 Pro. These devices work with the same Android 10 operating system.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little larger screen. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than TCL 10 Pro. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. TCL 10 Pro features just a bit better battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity. TCL 10 Pro captures much better videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.