Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Ember gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way better than TCL 10 Pro, having a general score of 87.1 against 72.1. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer and a little bit thinner device than TCL 10 Pro, although it is just a bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a slightly better screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a bit lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger display, a really brighter display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The TCL 10 Pro has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots clearer photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 4550mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.