Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Ember gray | Prism cube black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a 90.8 score against 72.1. Galaxy A51 5G is a just a bit thinner cellphone than TCL 10 Pro, but both have the same weight. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features and better performance.
Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better processing unit than TCL 10 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little lower screen density, they both have a same size screen.
TCL 10 Pro shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger aperture and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.