Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Ember gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone than TCL 10 Pro, although it's somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display and a really brighter screen. Galaxy F62 has just a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), they both have a 6 GB RAM.
TCL 10 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62. Both have a 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the same video resolution, a same size sensor, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 54 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.