Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a score of 79.5 against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is an notably older cellphone than the TCL 10 Pro, but it is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note7, because it has more processing cores and more RAM.
TCL 10 Pro features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The TCL 10 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The TCL 10 Pro features longer battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.