Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-19 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 6.60 ounces | -- |
| Ember gray | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 overall score. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra design is much thinner and noticeably lighter than TCL 10 Pro.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better display than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a little larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, much more brightness and a greater pixel density.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much more MP back-facing camera, a bigger aperture and a lot better video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a slightly better storage for apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a bit better battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.