Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Ember gray | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is better than the TCL 10 Pro, with an 81.7 score against 72.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S8 is way older than TCL 10 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. TCL 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S8 feature really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S8 has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher screen pixel density.
TCL 10 Pro counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S8 counts with a bit more powerful processor than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
TCL 10 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way larger sensor taking much higher quality photos.
TCL 10 Pro features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S8 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.