Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Ember gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than TCL 10 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is way heavier but thinner than TCL 10 Pro, and both were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful CPU than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. TCL 10 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
TCL 10 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.