Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Ember gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a 78.3 score against 72.1. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but vivo X70 Pro has newer 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. Vivo X70 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little lighter than TCL 10 Pro.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display pixels density.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro features a camera that is very similar to TCL 10 Pro's camera, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lot lower 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.