Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the TCL 10 Pro's general score of 72.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a more recent 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a newer and thinner phone than TCL 10 Pro, but it's also just a little bit heavier.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
TCL 10 Pro has a much bigger storage for applications and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the TCL 10 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro takes a little bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have a camera with a 64 mega-pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery life than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4550mAh.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the TCL 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the TCL 10 Pro, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.