Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than TCL 20 5G's 73.1 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 XL is an older cellphone than TCL 20 5G, but it's thinner and a little lighter anyway. Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better display than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better performance than TCL 20 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. TCL 20 5G has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The TCL 20 5G has greater battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The TCL 20 5G features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.