Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Power has a score of 76.1, which is slightly better than the TCL 20 5G's 73.1 global score. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G Power has 11 version while TCL 20 5G has Android 10, counting with a couple additional features and some performance improvements. Motorola Moto G Power's design is a little bit lighter but a bit thicker than TCL 20 5G, and both of them were released with only a couple of months difference.
TCL 20 5G features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little lower pixels quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 2400 x 1080. TCL 20 5G has more storage to install games and applications than Moto G Power, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
TCL 20 5G has a little faster processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 20 5G also has more RAM. TCL 20 5G takes much better photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures.
The Moto G Power counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than TCL 20 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.