Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is a bit better than the TCL 20 5G, having a overall score of 78.9 against 73.1. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user identical operating system features. The Galaxy M20 is an older phone than the TCL 20 5G, but Samsung was able to make it just a little lighter and a little bit thinner.
TCL 20 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 20 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. TCL 20 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2400 x 1080px and a bit larger display.
TCL 20 5G features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The TCL 20 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a camera with way more MP, a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs, a much better video quality and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than TCL 20 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.