Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Viewsonic | Vivo |
| Android 2.2 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 4.49 x 2.40 x 0.49 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| $ 1950.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.84 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.12 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a lot better than ViewSonic V350's 40 score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while ViewSonic V350 has Android 2.2 version, providing you some nice extra features and performance improvements. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is much heavier but incredibly thinner than ViewSonic V350.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than ViewSonic V350, because it has a much bigger screen, a much higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than ViewSonic V350, although it has no SD extension slot.
The ViewSonic V350 counts with a little faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 15,5 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster). Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than ViewSonic V350, because it has a 307% more battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than ViewSonic V350, because it has a camera with much more MP.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is also cheaper, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.