Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. The Google Nexus 6P is an older cellphone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a lot better looking display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a just a bit greater pixels amount in each screen inch, a quite better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a larger screen.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Google Nexus 6P counts with a much more powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 48% larger battery capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a greater camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.