Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. Google Pixel 2 is an noticeably older cellphone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Google was able to build it just a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little higher pixels amount in each inch of screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a lot larger display.
The Google Pixel 2 has a much better performing CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a way better camera than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a much higher video quality and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.