Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a general score of 84.2 against 71.5. The Galaxy A7 (2018) design is somewhat thinner and lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a very superior processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a camera with a much higher resolution, a way higher video definition and a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.