Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 global score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A80 body is incredibly older, a bit heavier and a little thicker than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro. The Galaxy A80 features a much better performing processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A80, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better display density. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a back camera with a higher resolution, a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a much better video resolution and a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.