Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has a general score of 83.3, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M30s has the older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy M30s body is a little bit lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is just a little thicker and was released many years before.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy M30s, because it has a little larger screen, more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. The Galaxy M30s counts with a really superior processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy M30s, because it has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture, a much better video resolution and a higher resolution camera in the back. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy M30s features just a bit longer battery performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.